Journal of Earth Science Research
Journal of Earth Science Research(JESR)
ISSN:2330-1740(Print)
ISSN:2330-1759(Online)
Frequency: Annually
Website: www.bowenpublishing.com/jesr/
Segmented Parametric Estimates of the Sea State Bias for Radar Altimeters
Abstract:
The traditional parametric models of estimating the sea state bias may result in errors, so two segmented modelling methods consisting of latitude and the significant wave height, respectively, were presented to improve the estimations of the sea state bias. The performances of the two models were evaluated by the explained variances, correlation coefficients, and model residuals. Compared with the estimations of the traditional parametric model under the same dataset, the results showed that the two segmented parametric models were both better than the traditional one and could effectively increase the accuracy of the sea state bias estimations. The segmented model of latitude demonstrated coherence with the segmented model of the significant wave height.
Keywords:Radar Altimeter; Sea State Bias; Parametric Model; Segmented Fitting; Latitude; Significant Wave Height
Author: Guoshou Zhang,Hongli Miao,Guizhong Wang,Yingting Guo,Yujie Jing

References:

  1. L. L. Fu and A. Cazenave, Satellite altimetry and earth sciences: a handbook of techniques and applications, San Diego, US: Academic Press, pp. 57-64, 2001.
  2. J. Hausman and V. Zlotnicki, “Sea state bias in radar altimetry revisited,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 33(sup1), pp. 336-347, 2010.
  3. S. Labroue, P. Gaspar, J. Dorandeu, et al., “Overview of the improvements made on the empirical determination of the sea state bias correction,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 614(614), pp. 543-547, 2006.
  4. P. Gaspar, F. Ogor, P. Y. L. Traon, and O. Z. Zanife, “Estimating the sea state bias of the TOPEX and POSEIDON altimeters from crossover differences,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 99(C12), pp. 24981-24994, 1994.
  5. N. Tran, S. Labroue, S. Philipps, E. Bronner, and N. Picot, “Overview and update of the sea state bias corrections for the Jason-2, Jason-1 and TOPEX missions,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 33(sup1), pp. 348-362, 2010.
  6. G. S. Zhang, H. L. Miao, G. Z. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Study on parametric models of estimating the sea state bias based on the HY-2 altimeter,” in IEEE International congress on image and signal processing, pp. 1100-1104, 2015.
  7. P. Gaspar, S. Labroue, F. Ogor, et al., “Improving nonparametric estimates of the sea state bias in radar altimeter measurements of sea level,” Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, vol. 19(10), pp. 1690-1707, 2002.
  8. S. Labroue, P. Gaspar, J. Dorandeu, et al., “Nonparametric estimates of the sea state bias for the Jason-1 radar altimeter,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 27(3), pp. 453-481, 2010.
  9. D. Vandemark, N. Tran, B. D. Beckley, B. Chapron, and P. Gaspar, “Direct estimation of sea state impacts on radar altimeter sea level measurements,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29(24), pp. 1-4, 2002.
  10. N. Tran, D. Vandemark, S. Labroue, et al., “Sea state bias in altimeter sea level estimates determined by combining wave model and satellite data,” Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, vol. 115(C3), pp. 1-7, 2010.
  11. D. P. Chambers, S. A. Hayes, J. C. Ries, and T. J. Urban, “New TOPEX sea state bias models and their effect on global mean sea level,” Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, vol. 108(C10), pp. 3305-3311, 2003.
  12. D. A. Mitchell, W. J. Teague, and K. R. Whitmer, “Evidence that sea state bias is different for ascending and descending tracks,” Marine Geodesy, vol. 27(3), pp. 483-494, 2010.
  13. X. G. Zhou, H. L. Miao, Y. H. Wang, et al., “Study on the determination of crossovers by piecewise fitting of satellite ground track,” Acta Geodaetica Et Cartographica Sinica, vol. 41(6), pp. 811-815, 2012.
  14. CNES and NASA, AVISO and PODAAC User Handbook – IGDR and GDR Jason Products, Washington D. C., US: Physical Oceanography DAAC, 2008.
  15. X. Y. Chen, J. S. Yang, W. G. Huang, et al., “Research on the fusion methods of significant wave height data from multisatellite altimeters,” Acta Oceanologica Sinica, vol. 31(04), pp. 51-57, 2009.
  16. B. Chapron, D. Vandemark, T. Elfouhaily, et al., “Altimeter sea state bias: a new look at global range error estimates,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 28(20), pp. 3947-3950, 2001.
  17. D. L. Witter and D. B. Chelton, “An apparent wave height dependence in the sea-state bias in Geosat altimeter range measurements,” Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, vol. 96(C5), pp. 8861-8867, 1991.
  18. L. F. Bao, P. Gao, H. L. Peng, et al., “First accuracy assessment of the HY-2A altimeter sea surface height observations: cross-calibration results,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 55(1), pp. 90-105, 2015.