Journal of Earth Science Research
Journal of Earth Science Research(JESR)
Frequency: Annually
Regional Differences of Hypsometry in Reference to Geotectonic and Geomorphometric Vectors in Atreyee River Basin of Indo-Bangladesh
Hypsometric Curve and Hypsometric Integral both are the superior indicators to determine the geologic development stage of any river basin. This paper’s goal is the identification of a regional hypsometric pattern in reference to the hypsometric curve (HC) and hypsometric integral (HI). It is also to investigate whether there is any control of altitude, shape and size of the basin, hierarchy of basin, geological and geotectonic settings of the basin on hypsometric pattern of the Atreyee river basin. The basin covers a 19748 sq. km. area of Indo-Bangladesh. In total, 33 sub-basins were created using 30 m. resolution of SRTM DEM and GIS for knowing the hypsometric pattern. Besides this, linear regression is used to investigate the influence of basin parameters on HI. The results demonstrate that the HI values of the sub basins range from 26.5% to 48.5%, and the average HI of the basin is 36.61%. Therefore, it is to be said that the basin is in the mature stage of the geomorphic cycle of erosion. It indicates that the Atreyee river basin has been passing through a youthful stage where there should be a balance between erosion and transportation; the upper catchment is eroded in quite a high rate, but the lower catchment is characterized by deposition dominance. The regression analysis represents that the hypsometric integral and area of all the 33 sub-basins showed very weak relation (r²= 0.009) and it is insignificant. Thus, no such control of basin size was found on HI. Such definite control is also not found on basin shape (r2=0.054) and basin altitude on HI. In case of stream order, the mean HI for 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order river basins are respectively 38.96%, 36.72%, 33.76% and 29%. Thus, from 2nd to 4th order river basin, no such hypsometric difference is found. Only in the case of the 5th order river basin is it quite low. Although, the river basin and its surroundings account for many faults and lineaments, which can be considered potential displacements of rock, but they have no remarkable impact of such fault zones for dictating HI. It might be that these sites were once modified by faulting activities, but ample deposition has created superimposed surfaces over the existing fault planes.
Keywords:Hypsometric Curve; Hypsometric Integral; Regional Hypsometric Pattern; Fault; Lineaments; Superimposed Surface
Author: Tamal Kanti Saha,Swades Pal


  1. A.N. Strahler, “Hypsometric (Area-Altitude) Analysis of Erosional Topography,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 63(11), pp. 1117-1142, 1952b.
  2. S.A. Schumm, “Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in bad-lands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., vol. 67(5), pp. 597-646, 1956.
  3. J.K. Weissel, L.F. Pratson, and A. Malinverno, “The length-scaling properties of topography,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 99(B7), pp. 13-997, July 1994.
  4. P. Rosenblatt and P.C. Pinet, “Comparative hypsometric analysis of Earth and Venus,” Geophysical research letters, vol. 21(6), pp. 465-468, March 1994.
  5. J.E. Hurtrez, C. Sol, and F. Lucazeau, “Effect of drainage area on hypsometry from an analysis of small-scale basins in the Siwalik Hills (Central Nepal),” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 24(9), pp. 799-808, 1999.
  6. C.G. Harrison, K.J. Miskell, G.W. Brass, E.S. Saltzman, and J.L. Sloan, “Continental hypsography,” Tectonics, vol. 2(4), pp. 357-377, 1983.
  7. M. F. Hutchinson and T. I. Dowling, “A continental hydrological assessment of a new grid-based digital elevation model of Australia,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 5(1), pp. 45-58, 1991.
  8. A. R. Wyatt, “Continental size, eustasy, and sediment yield,” Geol Rundsch., vol. 82, pp. 185-188, 1993.
  9. A.N. Strahler, “Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks,” Chow, V. T., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 439-476, 1964.
  10. W.B. Langbein, “Topographic characteristics of drainage basins,” United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 968-C, pp. 125-157, 1947.
  11. D.F. Ritter, R.C. Kochel, and J.R. Miller, “Fluvial processes,” Process geomorphology: McGraw Hill, Boston, pp. 189-231, 2002.
  12. A.N. Strahler, “Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology,” Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, vol. 38(6), pp. 913-920, 1957.
  13. N. A. Lifton and C. G. Chase, “Tectonic, Climatic, and Lithologic Influences on Landscape Fractal Dimension and Hypsometry: Implications for Landscape Evolution in the San Gabriel Mountains, California,” Geomorphology, vol. 5(1-2), pp. 77-114, 1992.
  14. S. Ciccacci, L. D’Alessandro, P. Fredi, and E. Lupia-Palmeri, “Relations between morphometric characteristics and denudational processes in some drainage basins of Italy,” Zeitschfirt fur Geomorphology, vol. 36, pp. 53-67, 1992.
  15. H. Ohmori, “Changes in the Hypsometric Curve through Mountain Building Resulting from Concurrent Tectonics and Denudation,” Geomorphology, vol. 8(4), pp. 263-277, 1993.
  16. G. Willgoose, “A Physical Explanation for an Observed Area-Slope-Elevation Relationship for Catchments with Declining Relief,” Water Resources Research, vol. 30(2), pp. 151-159, 1994.
  17. G. Willgoose and G. Hancock, “Revisiting the Hypsometric Curve as an Indicator of Form and Process in Transport-Limited Catchment,” Earth Surface Processes and Landform, vol. 23(7), pp. 611-623, 1998.
  18. L. D’Alessandro, M. Del Monte, P. Fredi, E. Lupia-Palmeri, and S. Peppoloni, “Hypsometric analysis in the study of Italian drainage basin morphoevolution,” Transactions, Japanese Geomorphological Union, vol. 20(3), pp. 187-202, 1999.
  19. Y. C. Chen, Q. Sung, and K.Y. Cheng, “Along-Strike Variations of Morphotectonics Features in the Western Foothills of Taiwan: Tectonic Implications Based on Stream-Gradient and Hypsometric Analysis,” Geomorphology, vol. 56(1-2), pp. 109-137, 15 November 2003.
  20. N. Mishra, “Hypsometric integral-A basis for determining the erosion status and priority number of ungauged watershed,” J. Soil &Water Cons. India, vol. 32(3), pp. 38-45, 1988.
  21. V.V. Rao, A.K. Chakraborti, N. Vaz, and U. Sarma, “Watershed prioritization on sediment yields modeling and IRS-I A L1SS data,” Asian Pacific Remote Sensing Journal, vol. 6(2), pp. 59-65, 1994.
  22. A.K. Goel and J.K. Singh, “Hypsometric analysis for foothills of Shivaliks,” Indian J. Soil Cons., vol. 28(1), pp. 84-85, 2000.
  23. K. Pradhan and P.C. Senapati, “Hypsometric analysis of some selected watersheds of Hirakund catchment,” J. Soil & Water Cons. India, vol. 30, pp. 183-185, 2002.
  24. A. Sarangi, A.K. Bhattacharya, A. Singh, and A.K. Singh, “Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) in assessing the erosion status of watersheds,” Indian J. Soil Cons., vol. 29, pp. 190-195, 2001.
  25. P.P. Dabral, “Hypsometric analysis of Dikrong River basin of Arunachal Pradesh,” J. Soil & Water Cons. India, vol. 2, pp. 97-100, 2003.
  26. O. Singh, M.C. Sharma, A. Sarangi, and P. Singh, “Spatial and temporal variability of sediment and dissolved loads from two alpine watersheds of the Lesser Himalayas,” Catena, vol. 76(1), pp. 27-35, 2008a.
  27. A. Pandey, Y.M. Chowdary, and B.E. Mal, “Hypsometric analysis of watershed using Geographic Information System,” J. Soil &Water Cons. India, vol. 3, pp. 123-127, 2004.
  28. O. Singh, “Hypsometry and Erosion Proneness: A Case Study in the Lesser Himalayan Watersheds,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 8(2), pp. 53-59, 2009.
  29. M. Dehbozorgi, M. Pourkermani, M. Arian, A.A. Matkan, H. Motamedi, and A. Hosseiniasl, “Quantitative analysis of relative tectonics activity in the Sarvestan area, central Zagros, Iran,” Geomorphology, vol. 121(3-4), pp. 1-13, 2010.
  30. A. Pedrera, J.V. Perez-Pena, J. Galindo-Zaldiver, J. M. Azanon, and A. Azor, “Testing the sensitivity of geomorphic indices in areas of low rate active folding,” Geomorphology, vol. 105(3-4), pp. 218-231, 2009.
  31. G.E. Moglen and R.L. Bras, “The effect of spatial heterogeneities on geomorphic expression in a model of basin evolution,” Water Resources Research, vol. 31(10), pp. 2613-2623, 1995.
  32. X. Huang and J.D. Niemann, “An evaluation of the geomorphically effective event for fluvial processes over long periods,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surf, vol. 111(F3), pp. 1-17, 2006.
  33. K.D. Awasthi, B.K. Sitaula, B.R. Singh, and M. Bajacharaya, “Land-use change in two Nepalese watersheds: GIS and geomorphometric analysis,” Land Degradation & Development, vol. 13(6), pp. 495-513, 2002.
  34. S. Omvir, “Hypsometry and Erosion Proneness: A Case Study in the Lesser Himalayan Watersheds,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 8(2), pp. 53-59, 2009.
  35. A. Sarangi and A.K. Bhattacharya, “Use of geomorphological parameters for sediment yield prediction from watersheds,” J. Soil & Water Cons. India, vol. 44, pp. 99-106, 2000.
  36. B.C. Kusre, “Hypsometric Analysis and Watershed Management of Diyung Watershed in North Eastern India,” Journal Geological Society of India, vol. 82, pp. 262-270, 2013.
  37. V. J. Markose and K. Jayappa, “Hypsometric analysis of Kali River Basin, Karnataka, India, using geographic information system,” Geocarto International, vol. 26(7), pp. 553-568, 2011.
  38. A. Azor, E.A. Keller, and R.S. Yeats, “Geomorphic indicators of active fold growth: South Mountain-Oak Ridge anticline, Ventura Basin, southern California,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 114(6), pp. 745-753, 2002.
  39. O. Korup, J. Schmidt, and M.J. McSavenecy, “Regional relief characteristics and denudation pattern of the western Southern Alps, New Zealand,” Geomorphology, vol. 71, pp. 402-423, 2005.
  40. R.C. Walcott and M.A. Summerfield, “Scale dependence of hypsometric integrals: an analysis of southeast African basins,” Geomorphology, vol. 96(1), pp. 174-186, 2008.
  41. S.F.R. Khadri and N.R. Kokate, “Hypsometric Analysis of the Morna River basin, Akola District, Maharashtra, India,” International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 3(2), pp. 563-568, 2015.
  42. P. Dash, S.P. Aggarwal, and N. Verma, “Correlation Based Morphometric Analysis To Understand Drainage Basin Evolution: A Case Study Of Sirsa River Basin, Western Himalaya, India,” Scientific Annals Of Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University Of Iaşi, vol. 59(1), pp. 35-58, 2013.
  43. J.V. Perez-Pena, J.M. Azanon, and A. Azor, “CalHypso: An ArcGIS extension to calculate hypsometric curves and their statistical moments. Applications to drainage basin analysis in SE Spain,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 35, pp. 1214-1223, 2009.
  44. O. Singh and A. Sarangi, “Hypsometric analysis of the lesser Himalayan watersheds using geographical information system,” Indian J. Soil Cons., vol. 36(3), pp. 148-154, 2008b.
  45. S.K. Sharma and N.K. Seth, “Use of Geographical Information System (GIS) in assessing the erosion status of watersheds,” Sci-fronts A journal of multiple science, vol. 4(4), pp. 77-82, 2010.
  46. S.K. Sharma, N.K. Seth, S. Tignath, and R.P. Pandey, “Use of Geographical Information System in hypsometric analysis of watershed,” Journal Indian Water Resources Society, vol. 31(3-4), pp. 28-32, 2011.
  47. S. Khatun and S. Pal, “Analysis of Regional Hypsometric Integral to Identify Landscape Evolution in Kushkarani River Basin,” Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, vol. 6(3), pp. 1-17, 2016.
  48. Y. Farhan, A. Elgaziri, I. Elmaji, and I. Ali, “Hypsometric Analysis of Wadi Mujib-Wala Watershed (Southern Jordan) Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques,” International Journal of Geosciences, vol. 7(2), pp. 158-176, 2016.
  49. V. Sivakumar, C. Biju, and B. Deshmukh, “Hypsometric Analysis of Varattaru River Basin of Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri Districts, Tamilnadu, India using Geomatics Technology,” International Journal Of Geomatics And Geosciences, vol. 2(1), pp. 241-247, 2011.
  50. K.Y. Cheng, J.H. Hung, H.C. Chang, H. Tsai, and Q.C. Sung, “Scale independence of basin hypsometry and steady state topography,” Geomorphology, vol. 171-172, pp. 1-11, 2012.
  51. S. Siddiqui and M. Soldati, “Appraisal of active tectonics using DEM-based hypsometric integral and trend surface analysis in Emilia-Romagna Apennines, northern Italy,” Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 23(3), pp. 277-292, 2014.
  52. A.Nikoonejad, M. Pourkermani, A. Asadi, and M. Almasian, “Hypsometric Properties of South Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt Basins: A Case Study in Namdan Basin in SW Iran,” Open Journal of Geology, vol. 5(10), pp. 701-717, 2015.
  53. A. N. Strahler, “Dynamic basis of geomorphology,” Bull Geol Soc Amer, vol. 63, pp. 923-938, 1952a.
  54. E.A. Keller and N. Pinter, Active Tectonics: Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, pp. 239-265, 2002.
  55. S. Chattopadhyay, S. Sajikumar, and M. Chattopadhyay, “Landscape Evolution in parts of Vamanapuram Drainage Basin, Kerala-a Hypsometric Approach,” Journal of Geological Society of India, vol. 68(5), pp. 841-856, 2006.
  56. S.K. Sharma, S. Tignath, S. Gajbhiye, and R. Patil, “Use Of Geographical Information System In Hypsometric Analysis Of Kanhiya Nala Watershed,” International Journal of Remote Sensing & Geoscience (IJRSG), vol. 2(3), pp. 30-35, 2013.
  57. A. A. Othman and R. Gloaguen, “River Courses Affected by Landslides and Implications for Hazard Assessment: A High Resolution Remote Sensing Case Study in NE Iraq–W Iran,” Remote sensing, vol. 5(3), pp. 1024-1044, 2013.
  58. A. B. Roy and A. Chatterjee, “Tectonic framework and evolutionary history of the Bengal Basin in the Indian subcontinent,” Current Science, vol. 109(2), pp. 271-279, July 2015.
  59. S. Sinha Roy, “Hypsometry and landform evolution: a case study in the Banas drainage basin, Rajasthan, with implications for Aravalli uplift,” Journal of Geological Society of India, vol. 60(1), pp. 7-26, 2002.
  60. G.R. Hancock and G.R. Willgoose, “The use of a landscape simulator in the validation of the Siberia catchment evolution model: declining equilibrium landforms,” Water Resources Research, vol. 37(7), pp. 1981-1992, 2001.
  61. A. Sarkar and P.P. Patel, “Topographic Analysis of the Dulung River Basin,” The Indian Journal of Spatial Science, vol. 2(1), Article 2, pp. 1-19, 2011.
  62. D.W. Burbank and R.S. Anderson, “Tectonic Geomorphology,” Blackwell Science, 2nd ed., Oxford, pp. 224-274, 2001.
  63. B. Delcaillau, B. Deffontaines, L. Floissac, J. Angelier, J. Deramond, P. Souquet, H.T. Chu, and J.F. Lee, “Morphotectonic evidence from lateral propagation of active frontal fold; Pakuashan anticline, foothills of Taiwan,” Geomorphology, vol. 24, pp. 263-290,1998.
  64. B. Delcaillau, J.M. Carozza, and E. Laville, “Recent fold growth and drainage development, the Janauri and Chandigarh Anticlines in the Siwalik Foothills, Northwest India,” Geomorphology, vol. 76, pp. 241-256, 2006.
  65. J. Jackson, R. Van Dissen, and K. Berryman, “Tilting of active folds and faults in the Manawatu region, New Zealand: evidence from surface drainage patterns, New Zealand,” Journal of Geology and Geophysics, vol. 41, pp. 377-385, 1998.
  66. L.A. Ramsey, R.T. Walker, and J. Jackson, “Fold evolution and drainage development in the Zagros mountains of Fars province, SE Iran,” Basin Research, vol. 20(1), pp. 23-48, 2008.
  67. O. Sung and Y.C. Chen, “Geomorphic evidence and kinematic model for quaternary transfer faulting of the Pakuashan anticline, central Taiwan,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 389-404, 2004.
  68. L. Andreani, K.P. Stanek, R. Gloaguen, O. Krentz, and L. Dominguez-Gonzalez, “DEM-Based Analysis of Interactions between Tectonics and Landscapes in the Ore Mountains and Eger Rift (East Germany and NW Czech Republic),” Remote Sens., vol. 6, pp. 7971-8001, 2014.
  69. M. Mumipour, M. H. Rezaei-Moghaddam, and A. M. Khorshiddoust, “Active Tectonics Influence On Drainage Networks In Dinarkooh Region, Zagros Mountain Range, Iran,” Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat., vol. 35, pp. 61-68, 2012.
  70. S. K. Nath, M. D. Adhikari, S. K. Maiti, N. Devaraj, N. Srivastava, and L. D. Mohapatra, “Earthquake scenario in West Bengal with emphasis on seismic hazard microzonation of the city of Kolkata, India,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 14(9), pp. 2549-2575, 2014.
  71. M. Alam, M. M. Alam, J. R. Curray, M. L. R. Chowdhury, and M. R. Gani, “An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history,” Sedimentary Geology, vol. 155(3-4), pp. 179-208, 2003.
  72. A. Uddin and N. Lundberg, “Miocene sedimentation and subsidence during continent–continent collision, Bengal basin, Bangladesh,” Sediment. Geol., vol. 164(1), pp. 131-146, 2004.
  73. R. El Hamdouni, C. Irigaray, T. Fernandez, J. Chacon, and E.A. Keller, “Assessment of relative active tectonics, Southwest Border of Sierra Nevada (southern Spain),” Geomorphology, vol. 96(1-2), pp. 150-173, 2008.
  74. S.A. Mahmood and R. Gloaguen, “Analyzing Spatial Autocorrelation for the Hypsometric Integral to Discriminate Neotectonics and Lithologies Using DEMs and GIS,” GIScience & Remote Sensing, vol. 48(4), pp. 541-565, 2011.
  75. A. A. Khan, G. H. Sattar, and T. Rahman, “Tectogenesis of the Gondwana Rifted basins of Bangladesh in the so-called Garo-Rajmahal Gap and their pre-drift regional tectonic correlation,” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Gondwana Symposium, Oxford-IBH, New Delhi, pp. 647-655, 1994.
  76. A. B. Das Gupta, “Geology of Bengal Basin,” Q. J. Geol., Min. Metall. Soc. India, vol. 69, pp. 161-176, 1997.
  77. J. K. Hornsby and J. R. Harris, “Application of Remotely Sensed Data to Geologic Exploration using Image Analysis and Geographic Information Systems,” Geographic Information System (GIS) and Mapping-Practice and Standards, Philadelphia, ASTM STP 1126, pp. 155-171, 1992.
  78. A. K. Al-Ali, “Hypsometric Analysis of Jabal Sanam –Southern Iraq-Using GIS,” Journal of Basrah Researches (Sciences), vol. 41(2), pp. 15-25, 2015.
  79. S. Bahrami, “Analyzing the drainage system anomaly of Zagros basins: Implications for active tectonics,” Tectonophysics, vol. 608, pp. 914-928, 2013.