Journal of Intelligent Transportation and Urban Planning
Journal of Intelligent Transportation and Urban Planning(ITUP)
ISSN:2373-0757(Print)
ISSN:2373-0765(Online)
Frequency: Annually
Website: www.bowenpublishing.com/itup/
Thinking Beyond the Car: Evaluating Road Diet Feasibility in Downtown Willow Glen, San Jose, CA
Abstract:
This paper looks at redesigning Lincoln Avenue in the Downtown Willow Glen neighbourhood of San Jose, California, using complete street principles to enhance mobility for all users and to create a convenient, safe, and aesthetically-pleasing commercial corridor. The paper explains and visualizes the effects of a simple road diet and a road diet integrated with traffic calming features, respectively, and their influences on both motorized and non-motorized users, and provides a clear image of the potential benefits that each alternative would offer to Downtown Willow Glen. To identify whether or not lane reduction or a road diet would be feasible for Lincoln Avenue, a literature review is conducted to explain the effects of a road diet on various case studies in terms of road operation and safety. The current land use and mobility characteristics of Downtown Willow Glen are compared with feasibility for lane reduction candidate roads, according to the literature review. Then, a scenario of Lincoln Avenue before and after road diet traffic operation for all users is explained based on a study conducted for three months on the Willow Glen road diet trial in Downtown Willow Glen. Finally, lane reduction is discussed as an adequate alternative to improve safety and enhance mobility for all users by adding traffic calming features to Downtown Willow Glen.
Keywords:Road Diet; Complete Street; Traffic Impact Study
Author: Bahar Vaezi

References:

  1. National Complete Streets Coalition, “What are Complete Streets?” Smart Growth America, http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/complete-streets/complete-streets-fundamentals/complete-streets-faq (accessed September 17, 2014).
  2. Rosales, Jennifer, “Road Diet Handbook: Setting Trends for Livable Streets,” Parsons Brinckerhoff: New York, 2007.
  3. Fehr & Peers Associates, INC, “San Jose Downtown Streetscape Master Plan,” The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, 2003.
  4. City of Orlando- Transportation Planning Bureau, “Edgewater Drive Before and After re Tripping Results,” 2002.
  5. City of San Francisco: Department of Parking and Traffic, “Valencia Street Bicycle Lanes: A One-Year Evaluation,” sfmta.com, 2000.
  6. City of Seattle: Department of Transportation, “Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before & After Study,” 2010.
  7. Burden and Lagerway, P. “Road Diets: Fixing the Big Roads,” Walkable Communities, Inc. 1999.
  8. Kueper, Daniel, “Road Diet Treatment in Ocean City,” NJ, USA, ITE, 2007.
  9. Rosales, “Road Diet Handbook: Setting Trends for Livable Streets,” New York, N.Y.: Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2009.
  10. Williams, Jonathan, Matthew Ridgway, and Will Lisska, Fehr & Peers, “Road Diet Case Studies. A memorandum to Chris Comeau, City of Bellingham, 2012.
  11. Knapp and Karen Giese, “Guideline for the Conversion of Urban four-lane undivided roadways to Three-lane two-way Left Lane Facilities,” The Iowa Department of Transportation’s Office of Traffic and Safety, 2001.
  12. Knapp and Jennifer A. Rosales, “Four –Lane to Three-Lane Conversions: An Update and a Case Study,” 3rd Urban Street Symposium, 2007.
  13. Knapp, Thomas M. Welch, and John A. Witmer. “Converting Four-Lane Undivided Roadways to a Three-Lane Cross Section: Factors to Consider.” 2001.
  14. Smart Growth America, “Nickerson Street Rechannelization, ” Before and After Report, 2010.
  15. Sohrweide, P.E., P.T.O.E., Bonnie Buck, Reid Wronski, P.E, “Arterial street Traffic Calming With three- Lane Roads,” ITE.
  16. Welch, Thomas M., “The Conversion of Four Lane Undivided Urban Roadways to Three Lane Facilities,” Office of Transportation Safety, Iowa DOT, 1999.
  17. Stamatiadis Nikiforos, “Road-Diet Conversions: Where and When,” 2014.
  18. Huang H., J. Stewart, and C. Zegeer. “Summary Report: Evaluation of Lane Reduction and Their Effects on Crashes and Injuries,” U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, http://www.tfhrc. gov/ (accessed November 24, 2014), 2004.
  19. Huang Herman F., J. Richard Stewart, Charles V. Zegeer, and Carol H. Tan Esse, “How much do your lose when your road goes on a diet?” Submitted to the Urban Street Symposium, 2003.
  20. Reynolds, Conor Co, M. Harris, Kay Teschke, Peter A Cripton, and Meghan Winters, “The Impact of Transportation Infrastructure on Bicycling Injuries and Crashes: A Review of the Literature,” Environmental Health Environ Health: 47, 2009.
  21. King, Michael, Jon Carnegie, and Reid Ewing, "Pedestrian Safety Through a Raised Median and Redesigned Intersections," Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board: 56-66.2003.
  22. Context Sensitive Solution, “Cross-Section Elements: Introduction,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, http://contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/reading/cross-section-12/ (accessed March 9, 15).
  23. Wikipedia, “Speed Limits in the United States by Jurisdiction,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_the_United_States_by_jurisdiction (access December 1, 2014).
  24. Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2014, http://tims.berkeley.edu/tools/srts/main.php (accessed December 1).
  25. Gluck and V. Stover, “Impacts of Access Management Techniques,” NCHRP Report 420, Transportation Research Board, 1999.